Ethical principles of reviewer
Reviewer provides scientific expertise of copyright material, so that his actions should be impartial in nature and are expressed in the following principles:
Manuscripts for review must be treated as a confidential document that cannot be transferred for review or discussion of the third parties who do not have that authority from the publisher.
Reviewer is obliged to give an objective and reasoned assessment of the findings of the study. Personal criticism is unacceptable.
Unpublished data from manuscripts submitted for consideration should not be used for reviewer’s personal purposes.
Reviewer who is not, in his opinion, so qualified to assess the manuscript, or cannot be objective, should notify the editor with a request to exclude him from the review process of this manuscript.